User talk:RBrown

Hello, welcome to Wikipedia. Here are some useful links in case you haven't already found them:

If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!

Tip: You can sign your name with ~~~~

Dori 05:57, Nov 20, 2003 (UTC)

Why are the messages below on my User talk page? I did not comment on these articles, nor have I edited anything on Wikipedia in years. RBrown (talk) 22:08, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm very new to this editing and still learning it. I removed the bizarre text of alledged muslim persecution of Palestinian Christians because it is unfounded and the only source to that being linked is from an israeli think tank with credibility issues. Wikipedia should be free of political iformation and merely informative. Claiming "other commentators" claiming persecution are infact from the above mentioned think tank. Most christians from bethlehem leave due to the hardship of the occupation, not any alledged travel restriction or persecution. I would know, I'm one of them now living in Sweden. Reading this dumbfounds us and is utterly inaccurate and politically driven. Thus it should not be there. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sphryne (talk • contribs) 22:09, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Crucifixion darkness[edit]

Hello, I just wanted to introduce myself and let you know I am glad to be reviewing the article Crucifixion darkness you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of PiCo -- PiCo (talk) 02:16, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 30[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Miracles of Jesus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Enlightenment (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:57, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Parliamentary by-elections[edit]

It is nice to feel appreciated. Graemp (talk) 07:10, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, RBrown. You have new messages at Talk:Crucifixion darkness/GA2.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Star of Bethlehem[edit]

Hi, I'm not an expert of Wikipedia policy. But at Star of Bethlehem are we getting close to WP:3RR with the guy (and his anon-IP alias) who is trying to promote his "antimatter comet" theory? If so, what should we do next? (You can reply here; I'll see it.) Feline Hymnic (talk) 14:23, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to have been fixed now.--Rbreen (talk) 16:16, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Use of Original Texts[edit]

Hello. You and I have both recently been editing the page Census of Quirinius. I noticed you removed an edit because it was sourced to original texts and commentaries. I can understand removal of the latter, as it references works by theologians, not biblical historians. However, I am curious as to removal of material sourced to an original text (the Hebrew Bible). While it is not a peer-reviewed scholarly article or university-level textbook, it nonetheless contains cultural and political background concerning the Jewish people participating in this census. I am interested in your reasoning for removing this edit (I mean this post with no hard feelings or sarcastic undertones; it is often difficult to discern the attitude of a post, especially when it could be interpreted as confrontational). Thanks, Jonathan Calebs (talk) 21:04, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest you read the Wikipedia guidelines on Original Research --Rbreen (talk) 21:23, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I suppose I was making my own conclusions from the text. Jonathan Calebs (talk) 20:06, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Historical Jesus[edit]

You can NOT make the claim "writers who opposed Christianity did not question the existence of Jesus" - this is like saying "none of Alexander's soldiers ever argued with him" - we have no way of knowing this. The best we can say is something like "we have no indication that writers who opposed Christianity questioned the existence of Jesus." Agreed? Geĸrίtzl (talk) 22:31, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]