Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cognitive Research Trust

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 11:41, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Update: I count 1 to delete, 3 to keep. Wile E. Heresiarch 02:01, 26 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

Ad. (from cleanup) Mikkalai 03:06, 20 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. We have an article on Edward De Bono that looks quite legitimate. I think this is also therefore legitimate. It just needs a lot of work. Isomorphic 05:54, 20 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
Keep the page, just not the text. In serious need of a cleanup, reads like a puff-piece press release. Average Earthman 08:45, 20 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. This is a real and significant organisation. Agree the article needs work. Andrewa 20:15, 20 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

content is wrong[edit]

CoRT is a kit for teaching thinking skills in the classroom. Maybe it could be useful in management, but that's a weird way to describe the package. Creativity is treated in one of the 6 books(10 out of 60 lessons), it's not the central theme of the course. Critical thinking also gets a book. There is a summary of the course at http://www.edwdebono.com/debono/cort.htm. A related package could be the Productive Thinking Program (Covington).

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.