Talk:Voltaic pile

Chemistry Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChemistryWikipedia:WikiProject ChemistryTemplate:WikiProject ChemistryChemistry articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Energy

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Technology C‑class

	Technology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

But how does it work?[edit]

I came here as a reasonably educated layperson (not a chemist), hoping to understand how the Karpen Pile is still working. This article talks about history, discovery, and other random stuff, but does not include a concise explanation (or approximation) of how these things actually work. Don't most articles include this in the first section? Could someone improve this, please? bendodge (talk) 17:01, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The battery Volta gave to Faraday[edit]

One of the Royal Institution curators gave this interview about the Voltaic battery Volta gave to Faraday http://www.culture24.org.uk/science+%2526+nature/art64985. Would this be appropriate to cite in the Voltaic pile article? Disclaimer: I work at Culture24. Thanks very much, RosieClarke (talk) 19:00, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Model for oxidation-reaction reactions[edit]

The model in this article appears to be incorrect. Basically, copper is not dissolved into the electrolyte; hydrogen evolves from the copper electrode. See Lemon battery#Chemical reactions. The most pertinent recent reference from Goodisman (Journal of Chemical Education) is unfortunately not readily available online, but there's a synopsis of the main points in the Lemon battery article. I'll change this section to the correct model shortly if there aren't any objections. Easchiff (talk) 07:26, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Specifications of the Volta Pile[edit]

I came to this page for some information on the volta pile and also its performance, size of disks, amps, that sort of thing. What I got is the old Galvani-Volta frog indoctrination. Sorry to say, I now have to look somewhere else, but it's not the first time with wikepedia either. 4.242.233.197 (talk) 10:15, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dead Link[edit]

The first referenced source contains a dead link so I did a Google search to find the source. The following URL appears to be active and will link to the referenced source: http://knowledge.electrochem.org/encycl/art-v01-volta.htm Kelsokat (talk) 03:30, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Electrochemistry[edit]

The first mention of Michael Faraday should include his full name. Also recommend a link to Faraday's Wiki page. Kelsokat (talk) 03:36, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Summary of edits: Added more info about Faraday, tied it into Electrochemistry and Voltaic piles. Added link to Michael Faraday Wiki article. Provided sources for new info and added appropriate sources for existing info which was not cited. Kelsokat (talk) 06:08, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dry Pile[edit]

This section currently reads almost as a side note. Recommend removing as a separate section and instead tie the mention of dry piles in with the above “Electrochemistry” section. Both sections are discussing early experiments performed in order to understand how the voltaic pile generated and conducted electricity. Kelsokat (talk) 03:37, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dry piles are important in discussing early electric clocks, the Oxford electric bell, and the early delineation of current and emf (Ohm's Law) etc and this section is a link in these articles. Suggest retaining. Sperth (talk) 06:48, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Voltaic pile. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:07, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]