Talk:Jeff Murdock

These quotes better off in wikiquote?? (and then you could add swadloads - Jeff is hilarious)--ZayZayEM 11:58, 10 Oct 2004 (UTC)

I think someone should put in Porn Buddys, even though it was an agreement between Jeff and Steve, Jeff is the person that discribes it. 203.208.69.48 05:29, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I have changed around the article quite a bit and removed some info from "Giggle Loop". If somebody wants to add it back then go ahead but I thought it was unnecessary. --Cornflake pirate 11:53, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I went ahead and added the info on Porn Buddies today including a scene transcript. I think it is a wonderful example of how Jeff's mind and mouth work. --RJ Johnson 16:08, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I changed "legalize" to "legalise" in the comments section.

Isn't it odd for Jeff to be the only character in Coupling to have his own article? True, the others are relatively unnotable, but, still...The Sporadic Update 18:43, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

BBC says his name is Murdock,so,shouldn't we change the name of the article?I'd do it myself if i knew how to...--200.161.136.227 18:57, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You're right, and I've moved the article to the right name. If you find any other mistakes, let me know and I'll fix them as well. Jayden54 20:21, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Too many quotes[edit]

I see someone has added the "too many quotes" template, and the quotes list is getting a bit much, so I'll start moving most of the quotes to Wikiquote soon (which will also allow a ton more quotes to be added!) Jayden54 20:47, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've moved most of the quotes to Wikiquote, and added the wikiquote template. If you want to add anymore Jeff quotes, add them to the Wikiquote page. Jayden54 14:33, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No pictures?[edit]

This article must have some funny pictures of Jeff. I don't have any free ones myself, anyone?Ori 19:58, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have any myself, but a quick search on Flickr found one image ([1]) which is licensed under a CC 2.0 BY license, which is suitable for Wikipedia and the Commons, but I have to wonder if that's the correct license (i.e. didn't the flickr user just rip it from somewhere else?). Even if it's not a free image, we can always take a copyrighted one, and claim fair use, as long as we only use it in this article. I'll see what I can do, since I've got the series on DVD. Jayden54 23:15, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'd rather use a free one, fair use is very problematic. The picture that you've provided is nice but I was looking for a funnier one. A picture of Jeff with that mask from the "The Freckle, the Key, and the Couple who Weren't", for instance. Or better - funny picture in which you can still recognize Jeff.Ori

12:38, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

High school[edit]

Jeff and Steve have been friends at least since high school I thought they called it secondary school. JohnathanZX4 11:42, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Richardcoyle.jpg[edit]

Image:Richardcoyle.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 23:14, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]