Talk:Fast mapping

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Psychology

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Linguistics: Applied Linguistics

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Applied Linguistics Task Force.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

from VfD:

This article was the subject of an educational assignment in 2013 Q3. Further details were available on the "Education Program:Georgia Institute of Technology/Introduction to Neuroscience (Fall 2013)" page, which is now unavailable on the wiki.

Fast mapping[edit]

Torn between transwiki to wiktionary, or deletion. It doesn't seem to be that widespread of a term.--ZayZayEM 11:24, 14 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Transwiki It gets nearly 7,000 Google hits as an exact phrase. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 11:53, Jan 14, 2005 (UTC)
Keep real term, not just a dicdef. Kappa 12:37, 14 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Keep interesting, and has the potential to be come a much bigger article. Thryduulf 17:57, 14 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Keep, it's helpful. Wyss 21:20, 14 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Keep, needs expansion. Megan1967 02:29, 15 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Keep. Encyclopedic value, potential to grow. JoaoRicardo 05:15, 15 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Delete. Neologism. Most of those 7000 google hits refer to a different meaning. Niteowlneils 17:15, 15 Jan 2005 (UTC)
BAD LINK for reference to the study. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.99.95.56 (talk) 16:34, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

end moved discussion