Talk:Trompe le Monde

Alternative music: Pixies Mid‑importance

	Rock music portal This article is part of WikiProject Alternative music, a group of Wikipedians interested in improving the encyclopedic coverage of articles relating to alternative rock. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page.Alternative musicWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative musicTemplate:WikiProject Alternative musicAlternative music articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is within the scope of the Pixies task force, a task force which is currently considered to be inactive.

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

This article was a past Alternative Music Collaboration of the Week! You can view other past collaborations in the archive.

<^>v!!This album is connected!!v<^>[edit]

All song titles serve as redirects to this album, have their own pages, or have been placed at the appropriate disambiguation pages.--Hraefen ^Talk 22:38, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sources?[edit]

I could place [citation needed]s on almost every sentence in this article, but that would clutter it up. So... Dingbats 14:42, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed - I agree. The article's on my to-do list; I've been going through the band's albums (Surfer Rosa and Doolittle are the ones I've worked on so far), bringing them to featured status. CloudNine 15:14, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bird dreams of Olympus mons[edit]

Hey guys, I'm asking here, since its probably the most likely to have Pixies boffins here. I'm contemplating "Bird Dreams of Olympus Mons" as a pop culture reference in the article on the greek Icarus mythos. (Guy jumps off Olympus mons and crashes to the ground, after a 'good fly') even if its a very impressionistic take. But is there any references out there to the meaning of this pixies classic, or am I just tripping here? 124.178.179.96 (talk) 07:01, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I Don't Get It[edit]

Letter to Memphis was the highest charting single from the album yet's the the only single without an article, I can make an article for this song right? --Mrmoustache14 (talk) 02:57, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Made it. --Mrmoustache14 (talk) 00:34, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Trompe le Monde. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111018005836/http://www.infodisc.fr/CDCertif_O.php?debut=400 to http://www.infodisc.fr/CDCertif_O.php?debut=400

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:51, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Could use more content under "Critical Reception" section[edit]

It's currently pretty sparse, as it contains short bits of information from only two critics, and as such does not have as wide of a viewpoint as it maybe should.

Nomadben (talk) 23:49, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Especially considering that one of them thinks this album is a contender for the greatest album of the 20th century -- which is of course wildly delusional. Woodstea (talk) 19:49, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Release date[edit]

Most sources I've look at show the release date as September 24, 1991 but here it's Sept. 23. Is there a controversy on this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zotdragon (talk • contribs) 19:02, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Zotdragon: BPI has the release date as September 23 and so does blender. --Muhandes (talk) 17:21, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]