Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Josh Mead

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Josh Mead was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was to delete the article.

It ain't quite speedy, apparently. But it is quite vanity, and nonsense. An Australian aspiring to be U.S. President? Ashiibaka tlk 00:09, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC)

  • With an Austrian-born actor elected as Governor of California, I wouldn't call it too far-fetched. Delete until Article Two of the U.S. Constitution is rewritten. Ian Pugh 00:39, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete: Vanity and then some. Don't be "domant." Geogre 01:52, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • Oh god. We need to vote for this? This really should be speedy. Delete Wyllium 02:38, 2004 Nov 14 (UTC)
  • Delete. When he actually becomes PM or President, reconsider. JamesMLane 07:06, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. Not yet notable. --Improv 15:56, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. This should be speedy. Bart133 16:36, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete; and this is not an auspicious start to his electoral career. :l Samaritan 23:13, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. GRider 22:21, 15 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. Why can't we just speedy delete non-notable people like this person? NeoJustin 01:47 Nov 16, 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. We don't speedy these because notability isn't in the criteria for candidates for speedy deletion. If you want this to happen, go see if you can get the policy changed. - Ta bu shi da yu 12:25, 19 Nov 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.