Talk:British Israelism

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the British Israelism article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3: 30 days

Christianity Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Skepticism Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Anthropology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthropology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anthropology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthropologyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthropologyTemplate:WikiProject AnthropologyAnthropology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

Scynthian (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article. This user has declared a connection. (COI declared here)

Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Grace Communion International#Worldwide Church of God|Worldwide Church of God]] The anchor (#Worldwide Church of God) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Mary Baker Eddy[edit]

This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered.

Hello, I’m an employee at The First Church of Christ, Scientist. The bullet in this article listing Mary Baker Eddy as an adherent is unsourced. Eddy was not an adherent of British Israelism. See Peel, Robert (1977), Mary Baker Eddy: The Years of Authority, Holt, Rinehart, and Winston. pp. 114-119. Would you please consider removing the bullet of Eddy from the list? FirsthandPOV-CCS (talk) 19:42, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm inclined to agree solely on the basis that calling her an "adherent" has a deeper implication. However, it should be noted that there are a number of sources that show her attraction to Totten's work and that she did briefly "flirt" with the notion of BI. But that wouldn't, in my mind, qualify as an "adherent". It would need more clear qualification for inclusion elsewhere in the article where the relationship could be more succinctly explained, so I have removed it from the bullet list. ButlerBlog (talk) 20:26, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]