Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maliia Kanaulahu

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Maliia Kanaulahu[edit]

Not notable/Vanity. --fvw* 14:21, 2004 Nov 27 (UTC)

  • You are a naughty article and you need to be spanked. Delete Wyllium 14:28, 2004 Nov 27 (UTC)
  • Maliia is very well known in BDSM fiction circles, has published several books, and is particularly known in the fetish scene in the U.S. Anyone who knows anything about animal roleplay, especially as it pertains to fiction has not only heard of her, but probably enjoyed her material. Anyone who hasn't heard of her work or thinks her work is simply "naughty" either isn't familiar with the BDSM scene, doesn't approve of the scene or has no appreciation for the more extreme fantasy elements of the scene Keep Dathida 19:33, 2004 Nov 27 (UTC)
    • This comment was made by User:203.195.105.34 (there is no User:Dathida), whose only contributions so far have been creating the article up for VfD here and spamming links to the article and the pages listed therein to other articles. --fvw* 14:44, 2004 Nov 27 (UTC)
      • Wyllium why did you wrote the dot on the Dathida page? [[User:MacGyverMagic|Mgm|(talk)]] 15:37, Nov 27, 2004 (UTC)
        • I can't get anything past you people, can I? :P I was searching for a "User contributions" page, and I wondered whether it would show up if there was a user page. Wyllium 23:32, 2004 Nov 27 (UTC)
    • You clearly have no knowledge of this subject. I suggest you learn more. Keep Dathida 19:33, 2004 Nov 27 (UTC)
  • If she published several books, I'd like to see links to known online bookstores instead of sex sites. Otherwise delete. [[User:MacGyverMagic|Mgm|(talk)]] 15:37, Nov 27, 2004 (UTC)
  • Ditto (Dathida, voting to Keep twice wont be counted. You can only vote once)Fledgeling 15:42, 27 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. Dathida's vote doesn't even count once -- anonymous user. --jpgordon{gab} 15:53, 27 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete: Web author, web site advertising. Geogre 19:39, 27 Nov 2004 (UTC)
  • del Mozzerati 21:51, 2004 Nov 27 (UTC)
    • If she has published books, the article should mention those. I must say, though, usually people who have published books in recent years show up a lot more on the web. Did she publish under a different name? -- Jmabel | Talk 07:04, Nov 28, 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep - David Gerard 20:39, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)

I also vote to *Keep I too vote to keep becuase I know she'll be in again in the near future.