Talk:Spread Firefox

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Please don't add content to the article, it was redirected with community conscenus Af648 07:04, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This article was on votes for deletion, the consensus was to redirect it to Mozilla Firefox. See the archived discussion for further details.

It should be mentioned that the above statement is more or less void by now. There seems to be enough momentum to let this article be on its own...

IcycleMort 13:06, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)

[edit]

File:Firefox-Wikipedia.png

I've created a combination of the Firefox and Wikipedia logo. Feel free to use it how/where you want. -- BRIAN0918  02:37, 20 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Parody works[edit]

http://spreadinternetexplorer.com should be mentioned in this article as a parody

Other ads[edit]

Should there not be at least a mention that the NYT campaign that resulted in the two page ad inspired other ads, such as the one that appeared in Germany's Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung? --JohnDBuell 01:29, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

teams[edit]

Teams were also created for LHC@Home ALPHA and Seti@Home BETA.

Spread IE[edit]

[1] - an anon deleted the explanation that spreadinternetexplorer.com is a parody site and examples, claiming it's "not neutral". I fail to see how this can be made "more neutral". SIE is a parody, and the examples given are basically the only content it's composed of. - Sikon 05:57, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • It was added by me, not the SIE team. And it does have a lot to do with SFX. It's a parody of SFX, after all. - Sikon 12:15, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • It's a parody of SFX, but what does that tell me about SFX? It's not like P.Diddy's article should say "Oh, and Weird Al parodied him by the way" —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.117.19.131 (talkcontribs)
Well if you been to some sites or forums, you would have noticed the spamming of FireFox fanboys trying to get you to switch to FireFox. this site is probally created to reflect that. Note that the user 69.117.19.131 chose to edit the artical internet exploter diff I think it reflects his opinion of FireFox and is clearly bias Af648 00:07, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]