Talk:James Bay

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hi[edit]

Hi to you all!! Look...I'm kind of researching for a HUGE GIGANTIC project on the James Bay Project...and I was kind of hoping that you people could maybe help me out. I think this is where you post comments, I'm not sure. Anyway, if any of you can contact me simsum_jgs_32@hotmail.com with ANY help related topics, but espescially how the environment is negatively affected, then you guys would do me A HUGE GINORMOUS FAVOUR!! So ... plz help! The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.156.21.166 (talk • contribs) .

James Bay Rivers merge[edit]

Merge "James Bay Rivers" to this article proposed - there is already a partial overlap of material and hardly any additional info there.

Merge completed. -- P199 17:07, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Seas of the Atlantic[edit]

James Bay and Hudson Bay both the Seas of the Atlantic Category but are technically a part of the Arctic ocean. Jcmiller 16:58, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Where do you get that? Looking at currents, islands, etc. Hudson Bay seems more closely linked to the Atlantic. The article in Wikipedia claims Hudson Bay is part of the Atlantic. Alanbrowne (talk) 20:03, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment[edit]

I have assessed this as Start Class, as it contains more detail and organization than would be expected of a Stub, and of mid importance, as I do feel that the subject of this article plays a strong role in the understanding of Canada. Cheers, CP 01:12, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Information Conflict with Akimiski Island[edit]

This page indicates Akimiski Island has 3400 people while the page for Akimiski Island says it's currently uninhabited. Which is it? mtffm (talk) 15:00, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bias[edit]

It seems a bit backward to say that "James Bay has returned to prominence in recent decades due to the James Bay hydroelectric project". What kind of prominence, and in the eyes of whom? I'm sure it has been consistently prominent in the eyes of the people living there, to whom the damming of the rivers that have supported their cultures for tens of thousands of years is quite painful, and something that is mourned rather than celebrated.


Economic development

James Bay has returned to prominence in recent decades due to the James Bay hydroelectric project. Since 1971, the government of Quebec has built hydroelectric dams on rivers in the James Bay watershed, notably La Grande and Eastmain rivers. Built between 1974 and 1996, La Grande Complexe now has a combined generating capacity of 16,021 MW and produces about 83,000,000,000 kWh of electricity each year, about half of Quebec's consumption. Power is also exported to the United States via a direct transmission high voltage line. The James Bay Project continues to expand, with work beginning in 2010 on a new phase that involves the diversion of the Rupert River.

Elizabeth.L.M. (talk) 18:26, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Right. That whole sentence is vague and pointless. -- P 1 9 9 • TALK 19:54, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Better map[edit]

It was not clear to me, where on the planet James Bay is located, after watching the photos on this page. 86.22.65.222 (talk) 12:08, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:James Bay (singer) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 15:01, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on James Bay. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:52, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]