Talk:Reanimation (Linkin Park album)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Studio album[edit]

Reanimation should not be classified as a true studio album. It is simply a remix album. Hello2112 00:28, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It is not simply a remix album. Marc Esnouf 13:13, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It would be very useful to show the Beats per minute and Musical pitch and Key (Music) of each song. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.173.126.215 (talk • contribs) 20:21, 18 September 2006

Why? --SayCheese 21:10, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Because that is useful, relevent information. --Nerd42 (talk) 02:11, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Then why don't we just list the BPM for every song on every album by Linkin Park? Bentu (talk) 18:18, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

music videos?[edit]

I heard there was a DVD of music videos for these songs - anybody know where you can buy it? and whether it should be mentioned in the article? --Nerd42 (talk) 02:11, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think there's a DVD of it. But there was a show on MTV which featured all the video's of Reanimation. RichV

The video for Pts. Of. Athrty. is on the enhanced disc. Just put the disc in your computer and click the link. YOU DO NOT NEED THE INTERNET. Apparently there are also videos for Frgt/10 and Kur4 Th Ich (Kur4's video is apparently just a re-directed version of the original Cure For the Itch) Pts. features a war between robots (like the one on the box cover) and aliens. Linkin Park's heads are at the centre of the robots' HQ and are directing the battle. Frgt/10 apparently shows a masked person with a spraycan, and wherever they spray, grass grows. --Bane II 10:27, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

are all those videos on the CD? otherwise, how can/did fans get them? --207.160.205.13 23:48, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
All the videos where aired on mtv once to promote the album, and now are only available on YouTube. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.186.212.71 (talk • contribs) 23:55, 21 May 2007

Track titles[edit]

Shouldn't the track titles be in all capitals? That's how it is on the reverse side of the case, and it looks much cleaner in all caps anyway. Plus it's easier to read, and you have to admit that it looks rather stupid in regular title case. Torvik 02:19, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Somebody edited the page and did some shit. They changed the information. The tracklist is not real. Who is making all these changes. Whoever is doing it. STOP!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lumidulce (talk • contribs) 23:53, 25 May 2007

BPM[edit]

Do we REALLY need the BPM for each song... Titan50 (talk) 18:56, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, how do we even know if the BPM is correct, I see no cites. FunGuy222 (talk) 17:23, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

the songs themselves are the source for those numbers. they can be reconfirmed by direct observation by anyone who has the CD. --70.252.139.167 (talk) 16:40, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

but is it really notable? Titan50 (talk) 16:16, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Some idiot effed with the track list[edit]

So, I'm editing it. Titan50 (talk) 18:24, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An official track list[edit]

This looks pretty official; how about we use as our track list? Raifʻhār Doremítzwr (talk) 12:34, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposal[edit]

I want to look for a few sources saying this album is electro hop and just add this genre in the genre list. Is this ok? Or will it get deleted? The album has a lot of electronic rock styles as it says in the genre box, and in the Wiki page for electro hop it says electro hop has foundations from post-punk coming from electroclash. I say it is electro hop because the album has electronic music, hip hop, synths, and dance music in it. What do you guys think? Go or no? 71.104.253.11 (talk) 23:40, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Reanimation (disambiguation) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 18:45, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Reanimation (Linkin Park album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:12, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Reanimation_(Linkin_Park_album)&oldid=1211337405"