Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Cath

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 14:47, 14 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Adam_Cath[edit]

Vanity Page

So wrote User:Paul Hope. And he's right. Blatant vanity - even says it is. Grutness|^hello? 02:41, 6 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Hopeless vanity. From the article: "The creator of this article intends it both as a medium for a simultaneous biography and autobiography. Feel free to fill in the details of Adam's life - hopefully, it will self-regulate."Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 02:44, May 6, 2005 (UTC)
Delete, not notable, vanity. Megan1967 04:42, 6 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 04:46, 6 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Ironically, the art currently on the page is probably more notable than Cath himself. --Mitsukai 19:47, 9 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Self-Delete. -- BDAbramson ^thimk 04:52, 2005 May 10 (UTC)
Delete - vanity - Tεx τ urε 16:39, 11 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
speedy delete but it did make me laugh. Sensation002 23:32, 11 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.