Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Whistle walk
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was ambiguous.
After reviewing the article, I am not convinced that this is a "mere dictionary definition" and am uncomfortable with the majority opinion (which was to transwiki). However, I also can find few references which validate this topic. I am going to exercise my discretion on this one and keep it (as "no concensus") for now. I have added the "dubious" tag to the article and put an explicit request for citations on the article's talk page. If, after a reasonable period, no one has come forward to verify the contents of this article, it may be appropriate to re-nominate it for deletion. Rossami (talk) 06:56, 5 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Whistle walk[edit]
Google search turns up a few mirrors, and this website --CDN99 15:57, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- I can find several references to this and it appears to be correct. However, it is more of a dicdef, so I would transwiki it to Wiktionary HowardB 16:35, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Provisional transwiki. I can find a very few references to this phrase as defined other than mirrors. It appears that it should be in wiktionary, but I would be more comfortable if we had some more attestation to its validity. HyperZonktalk 18:27, Feb 18, 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.