File:Three models of theory change.png
Three_models_of_theory_change.png (250 × 518 pixels, file size: 16 KB, MIME type: image/png)
This diagram image was uploaded in a raster graphics format such as PNG, GIF, or JPEG. However, it contains information that could be stored more efficiently and/or accurately in the SVG format, as a vector graphic. If possible, please upload an SVG version of this image. After confirming it is of comparable quality, please replace all instances of the previous version throughout Wikipedia (noted under the "File links" header), tag the old version with {{Vector version available|NewImage.svg}} , and remove this tag. For more information, see Wikipedia:Preparing images for upload. For assistance with converting to SVG, please see the Graphics Lab.Do not re-draw or auto-trace non-free images; instead, seek out vector versions from official sources. |
A hopefully useful graphical representation (along the lines of Venn diagrams) of three models of theory change derived from the history of science. The first shows a model of the sort associated with the work of Karl Popper, whereby each theory subsumes the information of previous theories completely. The second is one following from the work of Thomas Kuhn, where paradigms shift from one to another, rejecting some parts of the previous and subsuming some older parts to their new way of thinking. The third is an attempt (perhaps poor) to outline the chaos described by Paul Feyerabend, based in part on a graphic he included in his book Against Method, showing theories only partially related to previous theories if at all (the overlapping areas of the earlier theories are only the parts which could be "warped" and "distorted" to fit into the new theory) and are unbounded and incoherently defined. Somewhere in between these three models one can fit most other models of scientific theory change; they do a good job rhetorically at illustrating the various extremes. They of course obscure various nuances and differences between the different models, but do well as a "rough" guide, I think.
Created by User:Fastfission in Macromedia Freehand.
Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. Subject to disclaimers. |
| This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License. This licensing tag was added to this file as part of the GFDL licensing update. |
This file is a candidate to be copied to Wikimedia Commons.
Any user may perform this transfer; refer to Wikipedia:Moving files to Commons for details. If this file has problems with attribution, copyright, or is otherwise ineligible for Commons, then remove this tag and DO NOT transfer it; repeat violators may be blocked from editing. Other Instructions
| |||
|
Captioned As
[edit]Page | Caption |
---|---|
Sociology of the history of science | Three models of change in scientific theories, depicted graphically to reflect roughly the different views associated with Karl Popper, Thomas Kuhn, and Paul Feyerabend. |
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 04:38, 1 April 2005 | 250 × 518 (16 KB) | Fastfission (talk | contribs) | A hopefully useful graphical representation of three models of theory change derived from the history of science. The first shows a model of the sort associated with the work of Karl Popper, whereby each theory subsumes the information of previous |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage
The following 2 pages use this file: